pointedview (pointedview) wrote,

Review: Superman Returns

Despite the aforementioned back trouble, I saw three movies yesterday. By curious coincidence, two of them included Marlon Brando and Eva Marie Saint. I saw:
  1. Superman Returns
  2. The Enforcer
  3. On the Waterfront
I enjoyed all three of them, but I'll only cover the first in this post.

I liked Superman Returns, but with reservations. Please keep in mind that I've never read the comics, and I haven't seen Superman in a movie since I was maybe ten or eleven years old.

Things that worked for me:

  • Brandon Routh. I think he did an excellent job handling both the Clark Kent and the Superman personas. He balanced an undercurrent of gentle amusement with commitment and dedication, and delivered beautifully. He got me to rally for him in my inner monologue: I'll admit that I said "Yeah! Go, Superman!" in my head a couple of times. Good casting choice.
  • Frank Langella. I haven't seen anyone mention his performance, but I liked his interpretation of Perry White. I can't speak to how true he was to the comic book character, but the on-screen character seemed believable to me. He didn't overplay it, and he didn't underplay it. Just right.

  • Very good special effects. I don't know if they did it with miniatures, CGI, or some combination thereof, but the crystal formations looked like they had real heft and mass.
  • I liked that they made Lois' current flame a decent fellow instead of a bad guy. I guess now we know why Cyclops (James Marsden) had such a small part in the most recent X-Men film.
Things about which I'm ambivalent:
  • The evolution of Metropolis. The juxtaposition of Parker Posey's retro floozy and the Art Deco styling seemed to clash a bit with the cell phones and computers, in my opinion. It just felt odd to me. Speaking of Parker Posey, I'm a little tired of seeing her what feels like everywhere I look. I'm sure it's just me, and were it not that I really feel the character she plays on Boston Legal adds nothing good to the show whatsoever, I wouldn't have the issue. I know that's the writers' fault and not hers, but I'm still tired of her.
  • The new Superman costume. The materials seem practical and durable, but the rusty blood-red pigment seemed too dark. I got that they were going for heavy and serious with it, but it was a shade too much, if you'll pardon the pun.
  • It was longer than I expected (140 minutes, but it seemed longer), and every time I thought "okay, it'll end here," it didn't. I probably noticed it more because I really had to go to the bathroom.
  • The kid thing: this could either be really good, or a big steaming pile of super-poo, depending on how they handle it from here on out.

Things that I felt didn't work:

  • Both the writing of Lois and Kate Bosworth's performance seemed to hinder the depiction of the character. Even though I saw the movie about 25 years ago, I remember Margot Kidder. Her spunky Lois would never have turned to her boyfriend and said "Could you persuade Uncle Perry for me?" Heck, no. She'd have gone in there herself, right off the bat, and told Perry that, as a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, he needed her, not the other way around, and that was how it was going to be. When my spouse and I discussed this, he suggested that an optimistic reading of Lois' behavior would be that she was not herself and affected in that way by losing Superman for five years, but we both agreed that the movie wasn't that subtle. Besides, that's inconsistent with the information that we get from the movie about the title of her winning piece, "Why the World Doesn't Need Superman." Now, she's clearly lying to herself, but it seems like she was doing it with an outward show of bravado.

    Bosworth also lacks the vulnerable-beneath-a-tough-shell snap of Kidder's performance. She doesn't seem to have any real fire at all: even when the script is all "We've got to go back for him!" I never felt any real sense of urgency on her part. I never felt like she experienced much more than resignation.

  • The writing and portrayal of Lex Luthor. Without a doubt, this was the biggest problem I had with Superman Returns. The writing of his character and Spacey's depiction really don't seem to fit the rest of the movie. We've got the "more serious" somber tones in contrast with a cartoony, one-dimensional Lex. My husband says that Spacey's performance does good credit to the way Gene Hackman played the role, but to me, he made the role more like the sort of ruthless, sadistic bad guy I've seen Spacey play in other roles (Se7en; The Usual Suspects).

    Perhaps I'm just ruined by Michael Rosenbaum as Lex on Smallville, seeing as how Lex's story was the most interesting thing about that show during the first three seasons, but Superman Returns reduces the character to a petty crook with no finesse. I was immediately alienated by the bilking-the-widow bit at the beginning, and it didn't get any better for me from there. Lex Luthor, as imagined by the television show, is much more interesting when he's grey: you don't know when he's going to be on your side ... he's suave and manipulative, and, one of the most important things for any villain, he convinces himself that he's doing the right thing for humanity, and he's just misunderstood. The new movie Lex is base: he's just all about greed, and he doesn't get any more interesting than that.

    I'm not saying that Spacey is a bad actor. He's reasonably talented, and I know he's capable of giving a more nuanced performance, which makes the whole thing even more baffling. To my mind, he was either miscast or wholly misdirected. I'm inclined to think the former, given that his treatment seems so different from the rest of the movie. Maybe the actor and the director were both committed to emulating Hackman. I have no idea how much it resembled the comic book character, but regardless, I find television Lex much more compelling.

Side note: I know that Metropolis isn't New York. I mean it is, but it isn't. It's a comic book rendering of the Big Apple that's larger-than-life and in its own moment in time. All that being said, I think it's possible that some New Yorkers might feel a bit sad or wistful watching this movie. Watching Superman save the city ... well, putting myself in their shoes, it might conjure some painful memories. I can imagine that some might wish that they'd had a Superman there to save them during 9/11. I wasn't there, didn't lose anyone that I knew to it, but I still couldn't help thinking this. It's just a movie, but Superman is so iconic that I think he touches people in unexpected ways at times.

Overall, I liked it: I didn't love it. It's not that it was bad, it's just that Bryan Singer appears to have been at the top of his game with the X-Men movies. We might all have been better off had he stuck with that other hero gig.

Tags: movies, netflix

  • Review: Only Lovers Left Alive

    I thoroughly enjoyed Only Lovers Left Alive. I thought Tom Hiddleston (Adam) and Tilda Swinton (Eve) had wonderful chemistry: Swinton's kind, tired…

  • In Memoriam

    Thank you, Roger Ebert. Tonight, I'm raising a glass in your memory. You were an insightful writer who inspired many in your role as a film critic,…

  • My most anticipated movie of 2012

    New trailer for The Hobbit. So much love for Andy Serkis, and I think I'm developing a crush on Richard Armitage's voice just from the clips.…

  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded