?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry


Justify yourself to me.

Go on, do it. I want to hear it.

I'm talking about you people who use Microsoft's Outlook e-mail program. Still.

If you've been on the 'net for at least a year, you've probably gotten a virus in your In box. Maybe you opened it, maybe you didn't. Maybe you've had the shame and embarrassment of having your address book be a point of origin for one of these nasty worms remailing itself to all your friends. Maybe you've had one mailed to you.

In any case, you're likely aware that Outlook is vulnerable simply because it's one of the most widely-used e-mail programs out there, and those who write viruses target it for maximum delivery.

My question to you is this, then: why the heck are you still using it?

Before you get all snippy, I'm not talking about your work machine. I realize offices often force standardization, and they usually standardize on Microsoft.

This isn't even an anti-Microsoft rant, though the glaring security holes that they've left in this program have left it even more vulnerable than it might be.

It's really more about recognizing your place in the global scheme of things, in the big picture, and taking action. It's about "what is my personal responsibility to prevent the spread of these things," "who's my neighbor/friend, and what do I owe him or her," and about "what I can do personally to make things better."

Well, you can stop using that program entirely. There are other excellent e-mail programs out there, and some of them are even free. Ask yourself this: have you even taken the time to look? Did you download any of them to evaluate them? Or did you just take what came pre-installed on your machine, because it was easy, because it was the path of least resistance, and you didn't have to invest any effort? Is it ethical to continue to use a program with such a high risk factor for yourself and others? If you are willing to accept the personal risk of harm to your own property, do you have the right to accept the risk of harm to others, to own that? I don't think so. If you do accept that, and you infect someone else through your own ignorance or negligence . . . well, it sounds harsh, but in truth, it makes you an accessory to a crime. I don't want to hear any whining about how it is the fault of the virus programmer, not yours: if you're not doing everything you can to prevent it from spreading, then you're part of the problem.

If you actually have explored other alternatives and you still like Outlook, have you taken the time to do what you can to safeguard it? Not just anti-virus software, either: that does little good if you get a virus before the software manufacturer has had the chance to update it.

I used to help police a company by serving as a watchdog for some of the crap that users would send around the office. Hoaxes, junk posts, chain letters, you name it. You should've heard some of the comments in the IT department about these folks. But the truth of it was, their ignorance was part of the problem. Try as we might to educate them, they'd still do the same things time after time after time. "Don't do this," we'd say. We'd explain why not, in very simple human terms. No, really: I know how bad geekspeak can get, and I'm sensitive to it. Plain language only, I promise. They'd still do it. And we couldn't take their toy away from them, unfortunately, because they still needed it for business communication. Nice, well-intentioned folks, most of them, but clueless nevertheless.

But I digress.

If you've read this far, and are actually willing to look into other e-mail options, post here and let me know. I'll send you a recommendation.

Thus ends the PSA of the day. ;) It felt good to write it, too. Oh, did it piss you off? Bring it on. Impress me with your mad debate skillz. Explain to me how you can justify potentially or actually infecting your family and friends. Convince me how that's morally acceptable, assuming your morals include some facet of decency. I'll pop the popcorn, 'cause I want to hear this. And if some of you remove me from your Friends list over this . . . well, at least I know you were paying attention.

Tags:

Comments

goodjoan
Dec. 6th, 2001 04:26 pm (UTC)
Ok, I admit it...Outlook Express came with the computer and I am too lazy to look for an alternative. I'm also a terrible cheapskate so I find it hard to pay for software to replace something I have that works.

I am beginning to dislike it though simply because I get so much crap in my mailbox and the sorting/rules functions aren't as complete as I'd like them so I can't get a good rule or set of rules to sort out all of the junk mail.
pointedview
Dec. 7th, 2001 12:14 pm (UTC)
Hey, you! Thanks for writing, and for putting up with my rant, you generous spirit, you. :) LOVE the pic! I want to see her sometime when it is convenient, and it means SO much that you would take a minute to write here when you've got a new one! That's awesome on both fronts. :)

The "paying for something when I have something" is understandable. I hereby offer the feature-rich Calypso (page opens in a new window) as an alternative. I've loved it the whole time I've used it, and I'm probably one of the most demanding e-mail users out there. Of course, you may not like it, which is okay, too, of course! :) However, at least you'll be able to say you had another option to explore. There's also Eudora, but it's either adware or a pay solution, and frankly, I liked Calypso better anyway.

*BIG HUGS* and thanks for understanding. :)

goodjoan
Dec. 7th, 2001 11:27 pm (UTC)
Well, look what you made me do! I spent a fair bit of time this evening dowloading and playing with both calypso and eudora! It turns out that the free free (light, no ad) version of Eudora has a MUCH better filtering capability than either OE or Calypso. Why is it so hard to tell a program 'delete any mail that isn't addressed to me' Eudora actually has is/is not and contains/doesn't contail as filtering options!!

I'm happy! And you converted one more OE user away from the dark side!
pointedview
Dec. 9th, 2001 12:52 am (UTC)
Actually, we both win, here. To be honest, I haven't given Eudora a look in a while, but it sounds like they've made some improvements since last I checked it. I didn't know that about the "delete any mail that isn't addressed to me" option - slick! ;) Well, okay, I'd probably still have to set up some customized filters because just because the e-mail isn't addressed to me doesn't mean it's not for me, given the way our WomenGamers.com staff mail is set up, but still, it sounds nice. :) So, I learned something I didn't know. :) Yippee!

*hands you a bag full of tasty, congratulatory tortilla chips* ;)
goodjoan
Dec. 9th, 2001 02:02 pm (UTC)
I am *really* happy with the filtering on the free Eudora. There are 3 'levels' of use, a paid version, a sponsored version with ads and the 'light' version which has fewer bells and whistles but also has no ads and is free.

I am on several mailing lists and most of them Don't have my name in the header anywhere but I was able to set up several filters to pull out the list mail, anything from Dan, and then look to see if my name is in the header. If it's not, then it throws it in a file to be looked at later. It took a little while to set up, but to be honest it would have taken about 5 minutes had I read the help file first :)

Profile

Twin Peaks: Snoqualmie
pointedview
pointedview

Latest Month

January 2019
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

About Me:

Tags

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Ideacodes